Your signature has the power to make an impact
The legal battle surrounding William E (name changed), a pro-Trump inventor and businessman, raises serious questions about political motivations in federal investigations. Was he unfairly targeted for his political beliefs, or was this a legitimate case of financial misconduct?
The following timeline outlines key events that suggest an attempt to undermine a pro-Trump entrepreneur through legal maneuvering and overreach.
The Rise of William E and the Origins of the Investigation
In 2016, William E, a dedicated Trump supporter, built an online community and launched a campaign urging people to “Pray for Trump to be President.” Deep State agent Bob Screwdiv (name changed) received both an email and letter supporting Trump, prompting him to search for ways to shut down William E’s operations under the Obama-era Financial Crimes Task Force.
William E was a prolific inventor, securing multiple trademarks and a patent while working to build his company. A devoted family man, he had been married for over 20 years and was a father to three children. He was also a frequent guest speaker at his children’s Christian school, reinforcing his strong community presence.
(This video is unrelated to William's case but deals with the issues present.)
William E hired lawyers, accountants, and a management team to ensure full transparency in building his patent project. He granted them full access to records, receipts, and bank accounts, contradicting any notion that he was operating a fraudulent scheme.
William accepted investor money under legal guidance, though he was reluctant to handle others’ finances. Investors were contributing to a product that was eventually published on the Apple App Store with a 95%+ five-star rating.
William E has consistently upheld legal and ethical financial practices and respects the rules of society.
On July 11, 2018, President Trump revoked Obama’s Executive Order 13519, which had been used to justify investigations like the one against William E.
Trump’s Executive Order 13844 shifted focus toward securities fraud and crimes affecting the public. William E’s alleged fraud involved neither securities nor commodities, meaning the case should have lost standing.
The app was only available to wealthy accredited investors, further disproving claims that the case involved public-impacting fraud.
Special Agent Bob Screwdiv, a government accountant groomed under the Obama administration, saw his enforcement powers threatened after Trump’s order.
In August 2018, Screwdiv contacted investors to build an indictment. Investor Kathleen Adeleson (name changed) still contributed $300,000, contradicting fraud claims.
A phone call between Screwdiv and Adeleson confirmed no guarantees were made, discrediting claims that investors were misled.
Adeleson stated that William E never guaranteed returns. The FBI allegedly induced fear among investors, leading them to pull out funds and collapse the business.
Armed FBI agents raided the office without an indictment, a potential legal violation. Federal law prohibits government agents from using patents or trademarks in a way that causes confusion (USCS Title 15, Section 1125).
Adeleson confirmed that the FBI induced panic, not actual fraud. FBI records show William E defended the agency to investors, countering claims of witness tampering.
What happened to William E appears to go beyond a routine investigation—it suggests politically motivated persecution by a government official protecting his own job. William E was taken from his family by force and has been incarcerated for more than two years.
The case raises concerns about federal overreach, bureaucratic misuse of power and funds, and selective justice.
If a Trump-supporting citizen can be derailed despite following the law, what does that mean for the future of politically neutral law enforcement?